Who can support these failed parties and politicians - especially with such zeal?

Our founders had a necessary distrust of government and tried to build in every way to limit its influence on our daily lives.

These "public servants" of any party are hardly in it to serve us but rather for us to serve them. Anyone who believes or supports any of these people, and especially the Clintons, must really enjoy the rhetoric and not the accomplishments.

Our socio-political revolution started more than 50 years ago and the Clintons have been involved for 40. Yet to listen to the very liberals who swoon over them, we are still a racist, misogynistic, bigoted, bag of deplorables. College campuses are overwrought with rape. All whites enjoy some kind of privilege.

All men are sexual predators and pedophiles. The 1% used to be the 10%. Jobs have all but abandoned the middle class. We are calling each other hideous names with no attempt to compromise or live and let live.

The environmentalists are sure we are on the verge of a global apocalypse. We have an entire generation living in their parents' basements and complaining they want everything for free.

So why are you liberals all supporting - with salivating, thrall-like zeal - these failed programs and politicians?

And, hey, you Republicans!

You've had the advantage in Congress since the mid-90s yet all you've done is eat your own young and imploded on your own followers who you basically ignored until they recently nominated a lunatic fringe candidate to send you a message.

If you want better Veteran benefits, give them. If you want guaranteed social security, fund it. If you didn't want social health care, why did so many of you vote for it? If you want a balanced budget, why are you spending so much goddam money on this ceaseless war? If you want the jobs back, slap down the unions, relieve some regulations, get rid of these lousy trade agreements and let businesses thrive again.

I turned my back on the GOP in 1994 when the Republican Revolution exposed both parties as being separated only by their rhetoric.